In case you missed it, Roy is going to court tomorrow to continue his defamation hearing against the Prime Minister. Roy fervently argues that his intention was never to defame the Prime Minister and that he has always fought for the CPF, the pension funds of Singaporeans.
He insists that there needs to be more transparency in the government and it should start with the PM.
In light of tomorrow’s defamation hearing against the PM in open court, we reckon that transparency is definitely coming . . . but from who?
Here are the facts on the two men embroiled in a showdown for the truth.
PM Lee Hsien Loong
The Prime Minister of Singapore. He is the obvious fall guy for everything that is going wrong in and out of the country, from environmental problems caused by Haze to narrow corridors in housing units. During the most recent elections, the majority of Singaporeans placed their trust in his team to lead Singapore to a better future. Their greatest take-away from his leadership was that there was zero tolerance for corruption and that he championed a meritocratic system in a multi-racial society.
There’s no real point listing what Mr Lee has done over the current term of government. We’ve all heard enough praises and complaints about current government policies since naturally it usually does not benefit everyone. For this case, Mr Lee is suing Roy on a personal basis because Roy had accused Mr Lee of mismanaging CPF funds in several articles.
Roy Ngerng Yi Ling
Activist and human rights blogger who was recently fired from his job because of “conduct incompatible with the values and standards expected of employees, and for misusing working time, hospital computers and facilities for personal pursuits”. Roy has written numerous articles and staged multiple protests in Hong Lim Park to rally the public to his cause. Several of his articles leave much to be desired in terms of policy changes, especially suggesting that wages be increased with no consideration for the economic implications of that simple move.
After legal action was commenced, Roy began taking donations in order to fund his defence as well as prepare for any potential damages he may have to pay to the Prime Minister. Roy has reasoned that he has used the money to conduct research. His former lawyer M Ravi has also indicated he has used the money to fund trips to Europe for personal reasons and to attend/speak at workshops to propagate his messages further. (Source: Youtube & Youtube)
Of course, one must also remember the infamous stunt of approaching a charity carnival for special needs children to capture the audience and heckle his messages across. (Source: The Straits Times)
In November 2014, Roy was found to have indeed defamed Mr Lee by comparing him to City Harvest Church leaders and a reasonable ordinary person could have believed Mr Lee had committed criminal misappropriation after reading Roy’s articles. Roy later claimed he was not receiving support from Singaporeans in his battle with the government, stating that he had hoped “Singaporeans would join in the fight” but questioned “if this was ever going to happen”. He also later mentioned that he may stop blogging in December 2014.
Time for truth
The open court hearing will definitely attract a lot of interest for various reasons. Apart from the verdict of how much damages Roy must pay the PM, the public would also want to know
- What happened to donations that were meant to help him in his court case? Roy did a fantastic job appealing for those funds but the updates as to how he has been spending those funds stopped cold late last year.
- How is he funding these trips if he is not employed? Where is the money coming from? Is someone funding him and if so what is his agenda?
A quick look at Roy’s blog thehearttruths.com shows that he is currently collaborating with opposition parties, especially the Reform Party, to challenge the PAP in the upcoming elections.
- Is this whole incident a charade and that we were all non-the-wiser? Were we hoodwinked when Roy placed the victim card and asked for donations? Are we all pawns in this political tussle between the PAP and the Opposition?
Tomorrow’s court hearing will open our eyes and ears as we see Roy for who he is and not what his articles tell us to.